The drowned world: why floods haunt our imagination

The cultural afterlife of the flood myth

The Great Flood, Bonaventura Peeters (1614–1652)

What is it about floods? Why does water - when it overflows its banks, slips its confines, and covers the land - echo so insistently through the myths and literatures of every age? The flood is a symbol saturated with meaning. When the waters rise, they do not merely wash things away: they reveal, redraw the map, and demand that we look again.

I first became fascinated by flood mythology while designing an English curriculum which, quite unintentionally, seemed to gather flood stories like driftwood. In Year 7, we began with The Epic of Gilgamesh, whose ancient deluge closely mirrors the more familiar biblical flood. Then, in Year 8, as part of a unit on the Bible’s influence on literature, we turned to the story of Noah. Later that year, in a module on comedy, The Miller’s Tale appeared, with its bawdy parody of prophetic warning and a fake flood hung from the rafters. By Year 9, the waters had risen again: Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God brought a flash flood that reshaped the narrative, not with mythic grandeur but with bitter devastation. Without meaning to, we had built a curriculum threaded by rising waters.

This unplanned pattern intrigued me. How had I not noticed this destructive, redemptive motif before? Why do floods recur with such force and frequency across stories and civilisations? Why do they continue to fascinate, terrify, and demand interpretation? The more I read, the more I saw: from Mesopotamia to the Mississippi, from epic to allegory, floods are so often present whether as foregrounded events or metaphorical backdrops. This essay is an attempt to follow the flood’s path, not just across texts, but through the structures of meaning it carries with it, and the cultural sediment it leaves behind.

---

Long before climate anxiety made rising seas a literal concern, flood stories have provided a mythic structure for civilisational collapse. One of the most enduring examples is Plato’s Atlantis: not a utopia, as it is often misremembered, but a cautionary tale. In Critias, Plato describes a vast island nation that becomes powerful, arrogant, and decadent. The gods, offended by its arrogance, send earthquakes and floods to swallow it whole. According to Plato, “there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body sank into the earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths of the sea.”¹

The Deluge, Francis Danby, 1840

Atlantis is destroyed for its strength, its hubris. It represents civilisation overreaching itself. The flood, in this context, is not divine caprice but a rebalancing of the cosmic scales. Like the Biblical flood, or the deluge that silences humanity’s noise in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the destruction of Atlantis tells us something uncomfortable: not only that civilisation is fragile, but that it is doomed by its own success.

What connects these stories is not just water but a sort of moral geometry. Usually a boundary, the sea becomes a tide that unmakes the world. Islands vanish, cities drown and maps are rendered suddenly obsolete. Cities are devastated with mythic structures raised in their place. From the Hindu tale of Manu and the Fish, to China’s Gun-Yu (Great Flood) myth, to the Aboriginal Australian legend of Tiddalik the Frog, flood stories endure even when the civilisations that birthed them have long since washed away.²

The flood myth is one of humanity’s oldest and most widespread stories. Again and again, floodwaters rise, not just to wash away, but to expose what lies beneath. They expose the foundations on which lives and cultures have been built. They do not merely punish; they interrupt, purify and reset. And afterwards, whether it’s a rainbow or a raft or just a ruined coastline, there is always something left behind to remind us of what has been lost and what might still be salvaged. This mythic structure gives shape to our deepest fears about the future.

Gods, boats and beginnings

We should start at the beginning, or as close as we can get. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, written over four thousand years ago and the oldest surviving literary text we know of, the gods are wearied by the ceaseless din of human life and send a flood to silence the clamour. Utnapishtim (whose name aptly translates as “He Found Life”) is warned in secret by the god Ea, who whispers through a reed wall. Utnapishtim is told to abandon his possessions, turn his back on the world, and build a great boat. He obeys and constructs an ark:

The boat was one iku in area,
its walls were ten nindan high.
Ten dozen cubits the height of each of its sides,
ten dozen cubits each edge of the square deck.
I laid out the shape of her sides and joined her together.
I provided her with six decks,
dividing her thus into seven parts.

These measurements are monolithic. An iku is roughly 3,600 square metres or just under an acre and a nindan is equivalent to about six metres or 20 feet. This suggests a vessel of vast, almost mythic proportions, more symbolic monument than seaworthy craft. Utnapishtim then fills it with his family, his workers, his animals, and the “seed of all living things.”³ This, no doubt, all sounds very familiar. Both Utnapishtim’s ark and Noah’s are divinely commissioned and constructed to detailed specifications, each featuring multiple decks and sealed with pitch to ensure watertightness.

‘The Flood Tablet’ (Tablet XI) of The Epic of Gilgamesh, The British Museum

When the waters rise the result is not simply a flood, but a cosmic unravelling, so overwhelming that even the gods recoil from its force. The poem tells us, “The gods were frightened by the Flood, and retreated, ascending to the heaven of Anu.”⁴ The flood rages for seven days and nights, until the world is flattened, stilled and silenced. Eventually, the waters subside. Utnapishtim releases a dove, which - finding no land - returns, then a swallow, which also returns. Finally, he sends a raven, which does not come back. The world, it seems, is ready to for life to restart.

Unlike Noah, whose story ends with covenant and blessing, Utnapishtim’s tale is marked by detachment. The gods grant him and his wife immortality but exile them “at the mouth of the rivers,” a liminal space outside the known world. He becomes a relic of a former age, enduring but remote. When Gilgamesh seeks him out in search of eternal life, Utnapishtim offers no comfort. “There is no permanence,” he says, and recounts how swiftly the gods erase what once seemed eternal.⁵

Utnapishtim is a survivor, but not a redeemer. His boat preserves life but not meaning. Although he endures, he does not return. His immortality is not a reward, but a record. He is a silent witness to what was lost and cannot be restored. The flood, in this earliest telling, is not an instance of divine justice but of panic. There is no covenant, no promise that events will be recur. All that’s left is loss, and the uneasy knowledge that although the gods may regret what they unleash there’s nothing to stop them from doing it again.