David Didau: The Learning Spy

David Didau: The Learning Spy

Why I hate 'beautiful books'

Why students' exercise books make for dangerously unstable proxies for learning and poor revision resources

David Didau's avatar
David Didau
Jul 03, 2026
∙ Paid

An exercise book is so temptingly inspectable. It sits there, solid and available, full of dates, titles, diagrams, worksheets, corrections, and comments in variously coloured pens. You can pick it up, flick through it and feel you’ve seen something. Lessons have taken place, work’s been done, a teacher has intervened, students have responded. All the evidence one could ever need to feel confident that learning is or isn’t proceeding as desired, conveniently packaged between two floppy, card covers.

Inspection, in all its forms, has become curiously vulnerable to book scrutiny. We want to know whether students are learning, whether teaching’s effective and whether the curriculum’s coherent, but these are awkward things to establish. So we reach for visible proxies: full pages, neat presentation, written comments, coloured pen, student responses, evidence of challenge, evidence of progress, evidence of pride. Before long, the proxy hardens into the standard, and books are no longer bein…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of David Didau.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 David Didau · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture